Minimum Wage and Overtime Requirements for Employers of Home Care
Companions
In June 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the
US Department of Labor’s (DOL) regulation exempting employers of home
care companions from both the minimum wage and the overtime (OT)
requirements of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a
permissible interpretation of the FLSA.
This decision, however, will have little impact on employers
of home care companions in New Jersey and New York because the wage-hour
laws in those two states are more stringent and require that home care
companions be paid at least the minimum wage and OT. (As will be
explained below, there is a slight twist under New York law regarding
OT.)
In Connecticut, the Connecticut Department of Labor follows
the federal rules when it comes to the minimum wage and overtime
requirements applicable to domestic service employment.
As a general rule, in the area of wage-hour law, when
federal and state laws differ, the law that is most employee-friendly
applies.
This article outlines the applicable wage-hour rules
relating to the payment of the minimum wage and OT to home care
companions under federal, Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York laws.
It reflects the state of the law as of July 2007.
Federal
Law
Section 13(a)(15) of the FLSA exempts from the statute’s
minimum wage and maximum hours rules
any employee employed on a casual basis in domestic service
employment to provide babysitting services or any
employee employed in domestic service employment to
provide companionship services for individuals who
(because of age or infirmity) are unable to care for themselves
(as such terms are defined and de-limited by regulations of the
Secretary [of Labor]).
the term domestic service employment refers to
services of a household nature performed by an employee in or
about a private home (permanent or temporary) of the person
by whom he or she is employed. The term includes employees such
as cooks, waiters, butlers, valets, maids, housekeepers,
governesses, nurses, janitors, laundresses, caretakers,
handymen, gardeners, footmen, grooms, and chauffeurs of
automobiles for family use. It also includes babysitters
employed on other than a casual basis. This listing is
illustrative and not exhaustive.
The DOL further defines the term “companionship services” for
the aged or infirm to mean
those services which provide fellowship, care, and protection
for a person who, because of advanced age or physical or mental
infirmity, cannot care for his or her own needs. Such services
may include household work related to the care of the aged or
infirm person such as meal preparation, bed making, washing of
clothes, and other similar services. They may also include the
performance of general household work: Provided, however, That
such work is incidental, i.e., does not exceed 20 percent of the
total weekly hours worked.
The term ``companionship services'' does not include services
relating to the care and protection of the aged or infirm which
require and are performed by trained personnel, such as a
registered or practical nurse. While such trained personnel do
not qualify as companions
[under FLSA §13(a)(15)], this fact does not remove them from the
category of covered domestic service employees when employed in
or about a private household [who might otherwise be exempt from
OT pay, but not minimum wage requirements, under FLSA §13(b)(21)
(live-in domestic services employees)].
The DOL has interpreted FLSA §13(a)(15) to extend to
companionship workers including those “who are employed by an
employer or agency other than the family or household using their
services”.
[5] It is this interpretation that the Supreme Court upheld in
the Long Island Care case.
The DOL has extensive regulations dealing with domestic
service employment, including provisions defining and limiting the terms
“babysitting services” and “companionship services”.
As hinted at above, there is a second FLSA exemption,
relating just to OT, for live-in domestic services employees.
See FLSA §13(b)(21) and DOL regulations there under.
There is no law or regulation in Connecticut that expressly
exempts workers in domestic service employment from entitlement to
receive at least the minimum wage and OT. Nonetheless, the Connecticut
Department of Labor follows the federal minimum wage and overtime
exemptions for such workers, based on its reading of the definition of
“employee” in the Connecticut wage-hour law.
New Jersey does NOT
have a home care companion exemption from an employer’s obligation to
pay the minimum wage and OT. Thus, such workers are entitled to at
least the minimum wage and 1 ½ times the employees’ regular hourly wage
for OT hours in New Jersey.
New York Law
In the case of home care companions, New York follows the
FLSA overtime exemptions, but with a twist. In New York, OT hours
must be paid at no less than 1 ½ times the NY state minimum wage.
The OT hours don’t have to be paid at the usual 1 ½ times the employee’s
regular hourly wage if that rate is higher than the minimum wage.